Conventional Vs Robotic Stroke Therapy: Designing a Pilot study
Description
Stroke occurs when the blood supply to part of the brain is interrupted or reduced, preventing brain tissue from getting oxygen and nutrients, thus causing brain cells to die. Stroke is the 5th leading cause of death in the United States and is one of the major causes of disability. Conventional therapy is a form of stroke rehabilitation generally consisting of physical and occupational therapy. It focuses on customized exercises based on the patient’s feedback. Physical therapy includes exercises such as weight bearing (affected arm), vibration of affected muscle and gravity-eliminated movement of affected arm. Overall physical therapy aims at strengthening muscle groups and aides in the relearning process. Occupational aspect of conventional therapy includes activities of daily living (ADL) such as dressing, self-feeding, grooming and toileting. Overall occupational therapy focuses on improving the daily activities performed by individuals. In comparison to conventional therapy, robotic therapy is relatively newer therapy. It uses robotic devices to perform repetitive motions and delivers high dosage and high intensity training to stroke patients. Based on the research studies reviewed, it is known that neuroplasticity in stroke patients is linked to interventions which are high in dosage, intensity, repetition, difficulty, salience. Peer-reviewed literature suggests robotic therapy might be a viable option for recovery in stroke patients. However, the extent to which robotic therapy may provide greater benefits than conventional therapy remains unclear. This thesis addresses the key components of a study design for comparing the efficacy of robotic therapy relative to conventional therapy to improve upper limb sensorimotor function in stroke survivors. The study design is based on an extensive review of the literature of stroke clinical trials and robotic therapy studies, analyses of the capabilities of a robotic therapy device (M2, Fourier Intelligence), and pilot data collected on healthy controls to create a pipeline of tasks and analyses to extract biomarkers of sensorimotor functional changes. This work has laid the foundation for a pilot longitudinal study that will be conducted at the Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, where conventional and robotic therapy will be compared in a small cohort of stroke survivors.
Date Created
The date the item was original created (prior to any relationship with the ASU Digital Repositories.)
2021
Agent
- Author (aut): Thomas, Lovein
- Thesis advisor (ths): Santello, Marco
- Committee member: Kleim, Jeffrey
- Committee member: Maruyama, Trent
- Publisher (pbl): Arizona State University