Cancer Type Specific FrAmeShifT (FAST) Vaccine

132592-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
In this study, we demonstrate the effectiveness of a cancer type specific FrAmeShifT (FAST) vaccine. A murine breast cancer (mBC) FAST vaccine and a murine pancreatic cancer (mPC) FAST vaccine were tested in the 4T1 breast cancer syngeneic mouse model.

In this study, we demonstrate the effectiveness of a cancer type specific FrAmeShifT (FAST) vaccine. A murine breast cancer (mBC) FAST vaccine and a murine pancreatic cancer (mPC) FAST vaccine were tested in the 4T1 breast cancer syngeneic mouse model. The mBC FAST vaccine, both with and without check point inhibitors (CPI), significantly slowed tumor growth, reduced pulmonary metastasis and increased the cell-mediated immune response. In terms of tumor volumes, the mPC FAST vaccine was comparable to the untreated controls. However, a significant difference in tumor volume did emerge when the mPC vaccine was used with CPI. The collective data indicated that the immune checkpoint blockade therapy was only beneficial with suboptimal neoantigens. More importantly, the FAST vaccine, though requiring notably less resources, performed similarly to the personalized version of the frameshift breast cancer vaccine in the same mouse model. Furthermore, because the frameshift peptide (FSP) array provided a strong rationale for a focused vaccine, the FAST vaccine can theoretically be expanded and translated to any human cancer type. Overall, the FAST vaccine is a promising treatment that would provide the most benefit to patients while eliminating most of the challenges associated with current personal cancer vaccines.
Date Created
2019-05
Agent

Early Detection of Lung Cancer Using Low Dose Computed Tomography Screening, Thin Section Computed Tomography Screening, And Computer Aided Diagnosis

Description
The goal of this paper is to discuss the most efficient method to achieve early detection in lung cancers by reducing the occurrences of false-positive readings. Imaging techniques (computed tomography screenings) have greater impact than non-imaging techniques in

The goal of this paper is to discuss the most efficient method to achieve early detection in lung cancers by reducing the occurrences of false-positive readings. Imaging techniques (computed tomography screenings) have greater impact than non-imaging techniques in early detection for lung cancer. On the other hand, positron emission tomography and non-imaging techniques, such as liquid biopsy, are better at distinguishing cancer stages. Therefore, these techniques are not suitable early detection methods for lung cancer. Based on literature reviews, the combination that is most capable of early lung cancer detection incorporate low-dose computed tomography screenings, thin-section computed tomography screenings, and computer-aided diagnosis. Low-dose computed tomography screenings has lower radiation-associated risks compared to the standard-dose computed tomography. This technique can be used as both at the first examination and the follow-up examinations. Thin-section computed tomography screenings can be used as a supplement to check if there is any nodules that have not yet been discovered. Computer-aided diagnosis is an add-on method to make sure the computed tomography screenings images are being correctly labeled. Identifying other contributing factors to the effectiveness of the early lung cancer detection, such as the amount of forced expiratory volume, forced vital capacity, and the presence of emphysema, could also decrease the percentage of false positive outcomes.
Date Created
2019-05
Agent