This research aims to evaluate gender disparities in driving while under the influence (DUI) prosecutions, integrating perspectives from political science, sociology, and economics. A meticulous literature review reveals distinct patterns in drinking habits, risk-taking behaviors, biases within law enforcement, justice system dynamics, regional blood alcohol content (BAC) law variations, and the intricate interplay of gender norms and societal expectations. Notably, women face a lower likelihood of DUI arrest than men, a disparity influenced by a myriad of factors, including alcohol consumption patterns, ingrained biases, and gendered stereotypes. Economic dimensions of DUI convictions spotlight costs linked to healthcare, legal proceedings, lost productivity, and insurance premiums. The political arena actively molds DUI-centric policies, emphasizing the significance of decisions like adopting ignition interlock device laws and amplifying enforcement initiatives. Additionally, the nuanced experiences and challenges of transgender individuals within the DUI justice context underscore a pressing need for inclusivity and tailored policy considerations. A key observation is the obstacle faced by women, who are subjected to criticism both for the DUI offense and deviations from gender norms. This research underscores the necessity for harmonized policies that bridge the gender gap in DUI arrests, fostering an equitable justice system, and mitigating the profound economic and social repercussions of DUI offenses. The confluence of societal norms, economic ramifications, and political decisions constitutes the crux of gender disparities in DUI prosecutions, necessitating comprehensive and intersectional approaches in future research endeavors.