Single-cell DNA sequencing (scDNA-seq) can identify genetic differencesbetween individual cells and has broad applications in studying biology. For example, because scDNA-seq preserves haplotypes, it enables the addition of information about the fitness of different combinations of mutations into studies that…
Single-cell DNA sequencing (scDNA-seq) can identify genetic differencesbetween individual cells and has broad applications in studying biology. For example, because scDNA-seq preserves haplotypes, it enables the addition of information about the fitness of different combinations of mutations into studies that quantify the fitness of individual mutations. However, it requires separating cells manually or using machinery, which is time-consuming and costly as every cell requires a separate reaction. Thus, most studies are limited to a few hundred cells, and scaling up is expensive and challenging. This problem also makes it difficult to multiplex samples or to study multiple sample types in the same experiment. To solve these problems, I introduce a novel method for sequencing DNA in heterogeneous cell populations by using the cell itself as a container for sequencing reactions, eliminating the need to isolate individual cells. The method involves diffusing DNA polymerase and barcoded primers into intact cells and amplifying its DNA Intracellularly. To ensure that DNA from each cell can be uniquely identified, I use combinatorial barcoding, which assigns a specific barcode to each cell using a unique combination of non-unique nucleotide block sequences. This allows for the pooling of cells, making the method multiplexable and enabling the analysis of dozens of samples containing thousands of cells. The method is flexible and allows for targeted sequencing of a region of interest and whole genome sequencing. I optimize the method for various organisms and applications so it can be made accessible to a wide range of research groups.
Date Created
The date the item was original created (prior to any relationship with the ASU Digital Repositories.)
Protein misfolding is a problem faced by all organisms, but the reasons behind misfolded protein toxicity are largely unknown. It is difficult to pinpoint one exact mechanism as the effects of misfolded proteins can be widespread and variable between cells.…
Protein misfolding is a problem faced by all organisms, but the reasons behind misfolded protein toxicity are largely unknown. It is difficult to pinpoint one exact mechanism as the effects of misfolded proteins can be widespread and variable between cells. To better understand their impacts, here I explore the consequences of misfolded proteins and if they affect all cells equally or affect some cells more than others. To investigate cell subpopulations, I built and optimized a cutting-edge single-cell RNA sequencing platform (scRNAseq) for yeast. By using scRNAseq, I can study the expression variability of many genes (i.e. how the transcriptomes of single cells differ from one another). To induce misfolding and study how single cells deal with this stress, I use engineered strains with varying degrees of an orthogonal misfolded protein. When I computationally cluster the cells expressing misfolded proteins by their sequenced transcriptomes, I see more cells with the severely misfolded protein in subpopulations undergoing canonical stress responses. For example, I see these cells tend to overexpress chaperones, and upregulate mitochondrial biogenesis and transmembrane transport. Both of these are hallmarks of the “Generalized” or “Environmental Stress Response” (ESR) in yeast. Interestingly, I do not see all components of the ESR upregulated in all cells, which may suggest that the massive transcriptional changes characteristic of the ESR are an artifact of having defined the ESR in bulk studies. Instead, I see some cells activate chaperones, while others activate respiration in response to stress. Another intriguing finding is that growth supporting proteins, such as ribosomes, have particularly heterogeneous expression levels in cells expressing misfolded proteins. This suggests that these cells potentially reallocate their metabolic functions at the expense of growth but not all cells respond the same. In sum, by using my novel single-cell approach, I have gleaned new insights about how cells respond to stress. which can help me better understand diseased cells. These results also teach how cells contend with mutation, which commonly causes protein misfolding and is the raw material of evolution. My results are the first to explore single-cell transcriptional responses to protein misfolding and suggest that the toxicity from misfolded proteins may affect some cells’ transcriptomes differently than others.
Date Created
The date the item was original created (prior to any relationship with the ASU Digital Repositories.)
Protein misfolding is a problem across all organisms, but the reasons behind misfolded protein (MP) toxicity to cells are largely unknown. To better understand toxicity, I investigate if toxicity from MPs affects all cells equally or affects some cell subpopulations…
Protein misfolding is a problem across all organisms, but the reasons behind misfolded protein (MP) toxicity to cells are largely unknown. To better understand toxicity, I investigate if toxicity from MPs affects all cells equally or affects some cell subpopulations more than others, such as older cells. To define cell subpopulations, I optimized a cutting-edge single-cell RNA sequencing platform (scRNAseq) for yeast. By using scRNAseq in yeast, I studied the expression variability of many genes across populations of thousands of cells. I studied how the transcriptomes of single cells differ from one another in various conditions: at different stages in the growth phase and with different engineered MPs. Differences in gene expression between strains expressing misfolded vs. properly folded proteins were found, confirming previous proteomic data. Further, I found a greater number of cell subpopulations in a MP expressing strain compared to a properly folded protein expressing strain, implying more differentiated subpopulations, potentially in response to toxicity from MPs. This observation is consistent with previous observations that heterogeneity within microbial populations can be beneficial to their fitness by allowing that population to thrive in stressful environments. Thus, my data provide insights about evolutionary biology and how strains respond to stress. Further, after identifying subpopulations with a more severe transcriptional response to MPs, I studied the cells’ physiology to gain insights about why that subpopulation is sensitive to MPs and found an upregulation of markers of aging, stress response, and shortening of lifespan. Observing characteristics of cell subpopulations, I also found differences dependent on stages of the cell cycle. Overall, this study provides insights on the gene regulatory responses associated with MP toxicity by revealing which type of cells are most sensitive to this intracellular threat.
Date Created
The date the item was original created (prior to any relationship with the ASU Digital Repositories.)