Depression is one of the top mental health concerns among biology graduate students and has contributed to the “graduate student mental health crisis” declared in 2018. Prominent science outlets have called for interventions to improve graduate student mental health, but few studies have examined the relationship between depression and graduate school among life sciences Ph.D. students. In this coupled set of qualitative interview studies, 50 life sciences Ph.D. students from 28 institutions across the United States were interviewed. The first study explored how research and teaching affect depression in Ph.D. students and how depression in turn also affects students’ experiences in graduate school. Using inductive coding, four overarching aspects of graduate school that influenced student depression were highlighted, (1) structure in teaching and research, (2) positive and negative reinforcement, (3) success and failure, and (4) social support and isolation. The second study explored depression as a concealable stigmatized identity (CSI) by examining (1) to what extent and why graduate students revealed their depression to faculty advisors, graduate students, and undergraduate researchers, and (2) the consequences or benefits that they perceive are associated with revealing one’s depression through a hybrid approach of deductive and inductive coding. Graduate students most commonly revealed their depression to other graduate students; however, most were reluctant to share their depression with undergraduate researchers. These qualitative interview studies provide insights into creating more inclusive life science graduate programs for students with depression.

Guided by Tinto’s Theory of College Student Departure, I conducted a set of five studies to identify factors that influence students’ social integration in college science active learning classes. These studies were conducted in large-enrollment college science courses and some were specifically conducted in undergraduate active learning biology courses. Using qualitative and quantitative methodologies, I identified how students’ identities, such as their gender and LGBTQIA identity, and students’ perceptions of their own intelligence influence their experience in active learning science classes and consequently their social integration in college. I also determined factors of active learning classrooms and instructor behaviors that can affect whether students experience positive or negative social integration in the context of active learning. I found that students’ hidden identities, such as the LGBTQIA identity, are more relevant in active learning classes where students work together and that the increased relevance of one’s identity can have a positive and negative impact on their social integration. I also found that students’ identities can predict their academic self-concept, or their perception of their intelligence as it compares to others’ intelligence in biology, which in turn predicts their participation in small group-discussion. While many students express a fear of negative evaluation, or dread being evaluated negatively by others when speaking out in active learning classes, I identified that how instructors structure group work can cause students to feel more or less integrated into the college science classroom. Lastly, I identified tools that instructors can use, such as name tents and humor, which can positive affect students’ social integration into the college science classroom. In sum, I highlight inequities in students’ experiences in active learning science classrooms and the mechanisms that underlie some of these inequities. I hope this work can be used to create more inclusive undergraduate active learning science courses.