Cercopithecid primates today occupy the greatest geographic and climatic range of any non-human primate group. Pliocene and Pleistocene cercopithecids are often found together in fossil deposits across East and South Africa, raising the question of how these species co-occurred with one another and survived in increasingly arid and seasonal environments. Aspects of shearing ability, molar enamel thickness, and relative incisor, premolar, and molar proportions were analyzed in principal component analysis and used to generate six potential models of the cercopithecid dental morphological niche. Resulting principal component axes distinguish between taxa with varying proportions of leaves, fruit, insects, and seeds in the diet, but lose some clarity when variable subsets are used that exclude poorly-preserved or wear-restricted variables. Resampling was used to reconstruct the aggregate dental morphological niches of cercopithecid communities (taxocenes) from Africa and Asia today and from the African Pliocene and Pleistocene. Modern Asian cercopithecid taxocenes occupy a more restricted niche than their counterparts in Africa, but in both regions variation in taxocene structure is linked with past and current climate factors related to precipitation, temperature, and seasonality. Fossil cercopithecids from the Turkana Basin occupy an expanded niche in comparison to modern African and Asian taxocenes. In contrast, South African fossil taxocenes occupy a more distinct and restricted niche, which may reflect a mix of paleoenvironmental and taphonomic factors. Overall these results are consistent with existing research on modern African and Asian primate taxocene diversity and highlight the utility of a dental metric model for examining community evolution among Plio-Pleistocene cercopithecids in Africa. Evidence for a possible niche expansion during the early Pleistocene coincides with a period of well-documented hominin co-occurrence at the same fossil sites, suggesting that these two primate groups were diversifying in response to shared environmental stimuli.

Climate and environmental forcing are widely accepted to be important drivers of evolutionary and ecological change in mammal communities over geologic time scales. This paradigm has been particularly influential in studies of the eastern African late Cenozoic fossil record, in which aridification, increasing seasonality, and C4 grassland expansion are seen as having shaped the major patterns of human and faunal evolution. Despite the ubiquity of studies linking climate and environmental forcing to evolutionary and ecological shifts in the mammalian fossil record, many central components of this paradigm remain untested or poorly developed. To fill this gap, this dissertation employs biogeographical and macroecological analyses of present-day African mammal communities as a lens for understanding how abiotic change may have shaped community turnover and structure in the eastern African Plio-Pleistocene. Three dissertation papers address: 1) the role of ecological niche breadth in shaping divergent patterns of macroevolutionary turnover across clades; 2) the effect of climatic and environmental gradients on community assembly; 3) the relative influence of paleo- versus present-day climates in structuring contemporary patterns of community diversity. Results of these papers call into question many tenets of current theory, particularly: 1) that niche breadth differences (and, by extension, their influence on allopatric speciation) are important drivers of macroevolution, 2) that climate is more important than biotic interactions in community assembly, and 3) that communities today are in equilibrium with present-day climates. These findings highlight the need to critically reevaluate the role and scale-dependence of climate in mammal evolution and community ecology and to carefully consider potential time lags and disequilibrium dynamics in the fossil record.

The earliest Eocene marked the appearance of the first North American euprimates (adapids, omomyids). Despite the fact that leading hypotheses assert that traits involved in food acquisition underlie euprimate origination and early diversification, the precise role that dietary competition played in establishing euprimates as successful members of mammalian communities is unclear. This is because the degree of niche overlap between euprimates and all likely mammalian dietary competitors ("the euprimate competitive guild") is unknown. This research determined which of three major competition hypotheses - non-competition, strong competition, and weak competition - characterized the late Paleocene-early Eocene euprimate competitive guild. Each of these hypotheses is defined by a unique temporal pattern of niche overlap between euprimates and their non-euprimate competitors, allowing an evaluation of the nature of dietary competitive interactions surrounding the earliest euprimates in North America. Dietary niches were reconstructed for taxa within the fossil euprimate competitive guild using molar morphological measures determined to discriminate dietary regimes in two extant mammalian guilds. The degree of dietary niche separation among taxa was then evaluated across a series of fossil samples from the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming just prior to, during, and after euprimate origination. Statistical overlap between each pair of euprimate and non-euprimate dietary niches was determined using modified multivariate pairwise comparisons using distances in a multidimensional principal component "niche" space. Results indicate that euprimate origination and diversification in North America was generally characterized by the absence of dietary competition. This lack of competition with non-euprimates is consistent with an increase in the abundance and diversity of euprimates during the early Eocene, signifying that the "success" of euprimates may not be the result of direct biotic interactions between euprimates and other mammals. An examination of the euprimate dietary niche itself determined that adapids and omomyids occupied distinct niches and did not engage in dietary competition during the early Eocene. Furthermore, changes in euprimate dietary niche size over time parallel major climatic shifts. Reconstructing how both biotic and abiotic mechanisms affected Eocene euprimates has the potential to enhance our understanding of these influences on modern primate communities.