On 9 July 1990, in Moore v. Regents of the University of California, the Supreme Court of California ruled in a four-to-three decision that individuals do not have rights to a share in profits earned from research performed on their bodily materials. In its decision, the Supreme Court of California ruled that cancer patient John L. Moore did not have personal property rights to samples or fluids that his physicians took from his body for research purposes. Moore created the precedent in California that although physicians are required to disclose their research interests to their patients, patients do not have property-related claims to any samples that their physicians take from their body. The Supreme Court of California’s decision in Moore v. Regents of the University of California enabled physicians and researchers to retain legal ownership on samples taken from their patients’ bodies so that they can conduct what the court describes as socially important medical research, such as work on reproductive cancers or developmental disorders.
Details
- Moore v. Regents of the University of California (1990)
- Nott, Rohini (Author)
- Darby, Alexis (Editor)
- Arizona State University. School of Life Sciences. Center for Biology and Society. Embryo Project Encyclopedia. (Publisher)
- Arizona Board of Regents (Publisher)
- Law
- Medical laws and legislation
- Legal Medicine
- Right of property
- Right of property--United States--History
- Right of property--United States
- Cell lines
- Science and law
- Tumor Cell Line
- Hairy Cell Leukemia
- Differentiation Antigens, Hairy Cell Leukemia
- HeLa Cells
- Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy
- ethics
- Informed Consent
- Research Ethics
- Property, Right of
- Legal
- Mo cell line