Description

This article identifies equity outcomes associated with three biofuel systems in Brazil, Ethiopia and Guatemala. Acknowledging that winners and losers are socially and politically generated, the article identifies some of the factors behind the distribution of winners and losers along

This article identifies equity outcomes associated with three biofuel systems in Brazil, Ethiopia and Guatemala. Acknowledging that winners and losers are socially and politically generated, the article identifies some of the factors behind the distribution of winners and losers along different stages of three sugarcane-ethanol supply chains. Analysing the outcomes for equity within each case study reveals an uneven distribution that we argue is related to the procedure and structure of the given sugarcane-ethanol system, and the recognition of the impacts on different actors within those structures. Increasing equity in sugarcane-ethanol systems will require greater openness in decision making processes, in order that multiple voices are taken into account in the promotion, production and consumption of biofuels – particularly those of smaller and less powerful actors.

Downloads
PDF (514.6 KB)

Details

Title
  • A Comparative Analysis of the Equity Outcomes in Three Sugarcane-Ethanol Systems
Date Created
2015-06-01
Resource Type
  • Text
  • Collections this item is in
    Identifier
    • Digital object identifier: 10.1177/1070496515583556
    • Identifier Type
      International standard serial number
      Identifier Value
      1070-4965
    • Identifier Type
      International standard serial number
      Identifier Value
      1552-5465
    Note
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1070496515583556

    Citation and reuse

    Cite this item

    This is a suggested citation. Consult the appropriate style guide for specific citation guidelines.

    Hodbod, Jennifer, Tomei, Julia, & Blaber-Wegg, Tina (2015). A Comparative Analysis of the Equity Outcomes in Three Sugarcane-Ethanol Systems. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT & DEVELOPMENT, 24(2), 211-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1070496515583556

    Machine-readable links