Full metadata
Title
A Mixed Reality Platform for Systematic Investigation of the Neural Mechanisms of Multisensory Integration During Motor Planning
Description
Multisensory integration is the process by which information from different sensory modalities is integrated by the nervous system. This process is important not only from a basic science perspective but also for translational reasons, e.g., for the development of closed-loop neural prosthetic systems. A mixed virtual reality platform was developed to study the neural mechanisms of multisensory integration for the upper limb during motor planning. The platform allows for selection of different arms and manipulation of the locations of physical and virtual target cues in the environment. The system was tested with two non-human primates (NHP) trained to reach to multiple virtual targets. Arm kinematic data as well as neural spiking data from primary motor (M1) and dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) were collected. The task involved manipulating visual information about initial arm position by rendering the virtual avatar arm in either its actual position (veridical (V) condition) or in a different shifted (e.g., small vs large shifts) position (perturbed (P) condition) prior to movement. Tactile feedback was modulated in blocks by placing or removing the physical start cue on the table (tactile (T), and no-tactile (NT) conditions, respectively). Behaviorally, errors in initial movement direction were larger when the physical start cue was absent. Slightly larger directional errors were found in the P condition compared to the V condition for some movement directions. Both effects were consistent with the idea that erroneous or reduced information about initial hand location led to movement direction-dependent reach planning errors. Neural correlates of these behavioral effects were probed using population decoding techniques. For small shifts in the visual position of the arm, no differences in decoding accuracy between the T and NT conditions were observed in either M1 or PMd. However, for larger visual shifts, decoding accuracy decreased in the NT condition, but only in PMd. Thus, activity in PMd, but not M1, may reflect the uncertainty in reach planning that results when sensory cues regarding initial hand position are erroneous or absent.
Date Created
2023
Contributors
- Phataraphruk, Preyaporn Kris (Author)
- Buneo, Christopher A (Thesis advisor)
- Zhou, Yi (Committee member)
- Helms Tillery, Steve (Committee member)
- Greger, Bradley (Committee member)
- Santello, Marco (Committee member)
- Arizona State University (Publisher)
Topical Subject
Resource Type
Extent
178 pages
Language
eng
Copyright Statement
In Copyright
Primary Member of
Peer-reviewed
No
Open Access
No
Handle
https://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.2.N.187872
Level of coding
minimal
Cataloging Standards
Note
Partial requirement for: Ph.D., Arizona State University, 2023
Field of study: Biomedical Engineering
System Created
- 2023-06-07 12:47:51
System Modified
- 2023-06-07 12:47:56
- 1 year 5 months ago
Additional Formats