Full metadata
In Stuart v. Camnitz, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the decision of a North Carolina District Court that declared a controversial ultrasound mandate for abortions unconstitutional in 2014. The ultrasound mandate was a part of the Woman’s Right to Know Act introduced in North Carolina in 2011, which placed several restrictions on abortion care providers in the state. If enforced, the ultrasound mandate would have required physicians to perform an ultrasound on every patient before an abortion and simultaneously describe the resulting image of the fetus regardless of whether the woman wanted to hear the description. The District Court ruled the mandate an unconstitutional violation of physicians’ free speech rights. The Fourth Circuit Court’s decision to affirm the District Court’s ruling established that the state could not compel healthcare providers to recite what the court called state ideology to patients against their medical judgment, which broke with precedent set by prior rulings by the Fifth and Eighth Circuit Courts in similar cases.
- Venkatraman, Richa (Author)
- Schnebly, Risa Aria (Editor)
- Arizona State University. School of Life Sciences. Center for Biology and Society. Embryo Project Encyclopedia. (Publisher)
- Arizona Board of Regents (Publisher)
- Law
- Abortion--Law and legislation--United States
- Abortion--Law and legislation
- Fetus--Ultrasonic imaging
- Freedom of Speech
- Planned Parenthood Federation of America
- United States. Constitution. 1st Amendment
- Pro-life movement
- Pro-choice movement
- Women's rights
- Abortion, Induced
- Abortion History
- Abortion Centers
- Ambulatory Care Facilities
- Informed Consent
- Reproductive Health
- International Planned Parenthood Federation
- women's health
- Legal
- Abortion Laws
- Right to free speech
- Women's Right to Know Act
- 2023-01-25 09:55:07
- 2023-04-20 05:31:32
- 1 year 7 months ago