I am the Other: Alterity, Self, and Redemptive Suffering in Autobiography

This project charts the development of autobiography as a genre through two pairs of writers: Benjamin Franklin and Jean-Jacques Rousseau of the Enlightenment, and Oscar Wilde and James Weldon Johnson of the fin de siècle, leading into the twentieth century. The Enlightenment thinkers took an Augustinian confessional approach to the autobiography as a genre, revealing their flawed selves to the public in order to make themselves both authentic and virtuous. Through both these writers, autobiography became a way to replace the religious precepts of the Middle Ages, as the flawed self could be redeemed through society in its current historical moment rather than God. Franklin’s autobiography shows how self-making through economic credit is conducive to virtue, while Rousseau turned inward toward a natural goodness lacking in corrupt social relations. Despite their differences, both furthered the development of autobiography as an account of authentic self-making.

The fin de siècle writers fictionalized the autobiography and derived a concept of authenticity that develops from the suffering of social otherness. Wilde praised the poor over the bourgeois in a British Philistine society, while Johnson’s narrator argued for the authenticity of an African-American class striving for economic and social justice. Both writers redeemed suffering through the ideals of the subjective self, a turn inward that resembles Rousseau’s own look into his natural, innermost self. Overall, this project focuses on how the development of the genre between these two pairs of thinkers gives multiple accounts of self-making leading to the social Other becoming an agent for authenticity; how is the self to be read, understood, and made authentic through its imperfections and sufferings? The fictionality of the later works casts an overarching question: is attaining authenticity through autobiography merely fictional?