Full metadata
Argumentation is now seen as a core practice for helping students engage with the construction and critique of scientific ideas and for making students scientifically literate. This article demonstrates a negotiation model to show how argumentation can be a vehicle to drive students to learn science’s big ideas. The model has six phases: creating a testable question, conducting an investigation cooperatively, constructing an argument in groups, negotiating arguments publicly, consulting the experts, and writing and reflecting individually. A fifth-grade classroom example from a unit on the human body serves as an example to portray how argumentation can be integrated into science classrooms.
- Chen, Ying-Chih (Author)
- Steenhoek, Joshua (Author)
- Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College (Contributor)
Chen, Ying-Chih, & Steenhoek, Joshua (2014). Arguing Like a Scientist: Engaging Students in Core Scientific Practices. AMERICAN BIOLOGY TEACHER, 76(4), 231-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/abt.2014.76.4.3
- 2015-01-12 10:23:31
- 2021-10-25 01:53:22
- 3 years 1 month ago