Full metadata
Adaptive comanagement endeavors to increase knowledge and responsiveness in the face of uncertainty and complexity. However, when collaboration between agency and nonagency stakeholders is mandated, rigid institutions may hinder participation and ecological outcomes. In this case study we analyzed qualitative data to understand how participants perceive strengths and challenges within an emerging adaptive comanagement in the Agua Fria Watershed in Arizona, USA that utilizes insight and personnel from a long-enduring comanagement project, Las Cienegas. Our work demonstrates that general lessons and approaches from one project may be transferable, but particular institutions, management structures, or projects must be place-specific. As public agencies establish and expand governance networks throughout the western United States, our case study has shed light on how to maintain a shared vision and momentum within an inherently murky and shared decision-making environment.
- Childs, Cameron (Author)
- York, Abigail (Author)
- White, Dave (Author)
- Schoon, Michael (Author)
- Bodner, Gitanjali S. (Author)
- Julie Ann Wrigley Global Institute of Sustainability (Contributor)
Childs, C., York, A. M., White, D., Schoon, M. L., & Bodner, G. S. (2013). Navigating a Murky Adaptive Comanagement Governance Network: Agua Fria Watershed, Arizona, USA. Ecology and Society, 18(4). doi:10.5751/es-05636-180411
- 2017-07-17 11:38:09
- 2021-12-07 11:46:40
- 2 years 11 months ago